ENDURING MARKERS
1982–1992
I began work on Enduring Markers in 1982 during an extended stay in Paris. Subsequently, I brought it to this stage of completion in 1989–90 when I was able to spend eight months in France working full time on the project thanks to help from the Canada Council in providing me a Paris studio. From its nascence it has evolved and will continue to evolve and to occupy some part of my art activities.
In Paris cemeteries, particularly Pére–Lachaise and Montmartre, new bouquets of flowers are continually being placed by admirers on graves of famous people as a romantic gesture of remembrance. I casually wondered what would be a suitable bouquet to place on the grave of a great artist as a personal symbol of homage. Four paintbrushes in the colours red, yellow, blue, green. Paint brushes are encoded with their own multi levels of signification and these specific colours, which in additive mixture make white (life) and in subtractive mixture make black (death), on another level can become metaphysical referents to a wide range of concepts, metaphors and esoteric mysteries on life and death; relevant issues when contemplating the profound mystery of great art and the energy it continues to generate long after its creator has died. Every significant work of art contains within it this existential mystery that no formal logic can define.
Enduring Markers also alludes to some of my concerns about the extensive and complex polemics surrounding art and art making over the past century and the increasing speed with which the dialogue changes. Modernism’s continuing belief in painting as the high art form; pluralism’s fantasy that art can be free of history, and among some, that all extant historical literature on art and artists be deconstructed and revised to suit a specific agenda.
At this pivotal point in our history, la fin du siècle, it seems appropriate to consider these issues in relation to our own personal development as artists and further to meditate on other timely concerns. What have the past centuries taught us? What have we who have worked through a good part of this century as artists accomplished? What will the residue of our life’s work reveal to future generations?
In Enduring Markers I approach these issues, albeit somewhat obliquely. Potentially mundane documentary photographs of artists’ tombs with the addition of four different coloured paintbrushes generate contemplation on the meaning of that gesture, linking present to past, and suggesting a complex of metaphors and metaphysical referents about Art, Life and Death…
Duncan de Kergommeaux 1992
VINCENT AND THÉO VAN GOGH
Auvers–sur–Oise
Vincent Van Gogh 1853–1890, Théodore Van Gogh 1857–1891 Village cemetery, Auvers–sur–Oise
On May 21, 1890, Vincent Van–Gogh moved to Auvers–sur–Oise, the small village north of Paris, which throughout the 19th century had attracted many landscape painters. It was there on July 29, 1890, two days after being accidently shot or shooting himself with a pistol, he died in the Inn Ravoux–now Maison de Van Gogh.
When I mentioned to a friend that it was almost the 100th anniversary of Van Gogh’s death he suggested we rent a car and drive to Auvers to visit his tomb. This seemed a great opportunity to pay my homage and get some photographs.
I suggested some other artists whose tombs we could visit after Van Gogh’s if we made it a three day pilgrimage; Monet in Givernay, Duchamp in Rouen and Braque in Varangeville, just west of Dieppe. I wanted to indulge fully in the luxury of having a driver. When I’m alone I find it almost impossible to simultaneously drive, scrutinize the map, and remain fully alert to the manic maneuvers of Gallic drivers.
April, 1990, 11:am, Auvers–sur-Oise: In a reverie, every slow shift of my acquisitive gaze envisioning the artists; Daubigny painting the river from his floating studio, Pissaro, Cezanne and Van Gogh hard at work in the landscape, I momentarily think–“I should have brought my paint-box to Auvers instead of my camera.” Then a flush of reality removes the brush from my hand as I realize that for me to paint in this charged land would just be adding another anachronistic footnote to what time has clarified sufficiently. Today, one can never hope to penetrate the long shadows cast by the immediacy of visual history so forcefully imposed upon one’s vision here in Auvers. Great painters have trod these roads many times before and left their inspired works for us to ponder: “Village Road, Auvers”, “Dr. Gachet’s House”, “House of the Hanged Man”, “Crows over the Wheat Fields”… I simply could add no new meaning to the dialogue.
The small village cemetery where Van Gogh is buried beside his brother Theo, is on a hill just past the Notre Dame Church, the subject of one of his last major paintings. It was easy to find the ivy covered tomb on which were casually thrown a few fresh flowers and carefully placed, directly in front of Vincent’s headstone, a bouquet of two roses and a purple iris wrapped in cellophane with a note saying “pour Vincent et Théo Mille Années–Maril”.
I added my bouquet of paint brushes, took my photographs and left for Givernay hoping Monet’s tomb would be as easy to find and the ghosts of painters past not quite so active.
CLAUDE MONET
Givernay
Claude Monet, 1840–1926 Village churchyard–Giverny
April 16, 1990: We left Auvers–sur–Oise about 11am and by 12:30pm, after doing a few tourist things along the way, arrived in Vernon where we re–crossed the Seine and drove the 4 KM south–east along the river to Giverny.
In the spring of 1893, the almost penniless Monet was searching for a new place to set up his large household; one that would provide a more inspirational atmosphere for his work than where he lived in Poissy, which he detested. It took him several months and many long trips on the Pacy–sur–Eure railway line searching every small village for a suitable place to rent. He finally moved on April 29, 1893, with his two children and Alice Hochedé and her five children to “le Pressoir,” a long, nondescript house with a large walled garden encroached upon by an apple orchard in the village of Giverny. This would be their home, and for him a major painting environment for the rest of his long life. Here he would establish his fame, build with great love his magnificent garden and paint his most–loved water lily paintings.
After years of neglect his house and gardens have now been beautifully restored as a national monument with a large parking lot and gift boutique across the road. For the art lover, restorations are always a bit problematic and, at best, a mixed blessing when they attract so many tours. And for the tourist, often just another curio to mindlessly gaze upon, or a place to congregate en–masse to take photographs during another pause along their road to misunderstanding. But, if this is the price one has to pay, no matter how many buses are left in the parking lot with their motors always running, once inside the walls one can move away from the crowds and let the restoration reveal itself as a miracle one would not want to be deprived of.
When we arrived, I had expected to find the parking lot full as it usually is, but there were no cars or buses. I was relieved, yet disappointed to find everything locked up tight which prevented us from simply asking at the information desk where he was buried.
When Monet died his body had been placed on a hand cart and wheeled to the family plot, followed by a few artist friends including Bonnard and Vuillard and his close personal friend, Prime Minister Clemenceau. I concluded we would not have far too look. We retraced our route toward Vernon hoping to find a cemetery. We stopped to ask the first person we saw walking on the road if she knew where the famous artist Monet was buried. She asked me if I was a Canadian, which was a surprisingly strange answer to my question. She was, as it happened, an exchange student from Canada and a bit homesick. After some small talk she pointed beyond the brush at the edge of the road and said; “See that large tree over there, his grave is right under it.” The dense foliage along the roadside had well hidden a small churchyard we would have missed without her help. As I had hoped, his tomb was covered with a garden of flowers. While I set up and took my photographs my “driver” spent his time trying to work out the complex genealogical links to Monet of all those with other names who had been interred in the same plot. By 2pm we were on our way to Rouen where we planned to spend the evening.
MARCEL DUCHAMP
Rouen
Marcel Duchamp, 1887–1968, Raymond Duchamp–Villon, 1876-–1918, Suzanne Duchamp–Grotti, 1889–1965, Cimetière Monumental–Rouen
In 20th century western art history Duchamp has such a large presence that I thought his fame would lead me directly to his tomb. I knew he had died in Neuilly, a suburb just west of Paris, so there I began.
The staff in the gatehouse of Cimetière au Neuilly could offer no help until one took interest in my project and spent over an hour searching records, discovering that he had died in Neuilly but was transported to Rouen–Seine–Maritime for interment.
On April 16, 1990, after visiting the Canadian War Graves in Dieppe we drove to Rouen to spend the night and the following day began searching for Duchamp’s tomb. We started at the tourist office where an attendant suggested if we were looking for an artist we should enquire at the Rouen Art Museum. However, they could not help.
After much map searching and driving around we finally arrived at Cimetière Monumental, a vast conglomerate cemetery on a hill overlooking the city. At the gatehouse there was no record of Duchamp, but fortunately one attendant did know the tomb’s location and got into our car and directed us to a large family plot with three elevated granite slabs overlooking a truly magnificent view of old Rouen.
Marcel was under the right slab interred with his wife Gaby, his brothers, Raymond Duchamp Villon and Jacques Villon and sister Suzanne Duchamp Grotti, all distinguished artists.
“D’ailleurs c’est toujours les autres qui meurent”
GEORGES BRAQUE
Varengeville
Georges Braque, 1882–1963 Cimetiére marin de Varengeville–sur–mer
April 16, 1990: In the early afternoon after photographing the tomb of Monet in the churchyard at Givernay, we drove thru to Dieppe bypassing Rouen to where we would return and spend the night. From Dieppe we took the coast road southwest through Pourville to the western limits of Varengeville. Turning toward the water, we drove on for what seemed a very long time down a beautiful treed road of elegant summer homes and retirement estates before reaching the small church and sailor’s graveyard perched on a cliff overlooking the water. The view, I imagined, was just as Monet had seen it at the end of the 19th century when he made his painting “Church at Varengeville.”
Braque’s tomb was there filling a good part of the small cemetery. It was virtually impossible to photograph in such a confined space with the lenses I had, and having to face my camera directly into the afternoon sun. Anyway, I took some shots and then returned to Dieppe and an interesting diversion–The Canadian War Graves Cemetery. It was a very moving experience. My academic exercise of finding and photographing the tombs of dead artists who had achieved fame and accomplishment during their usually long lifetimes cast for me a very different light on how I saw those endless rows of white crosses marking the graves of young men sacrificed in war. Sacrificed, before having one chance to realize any of their own potential creativity. No philosophical justification seemed to reach out and satisfy my need to comprehend. We spent a good hour walking the rows and reading the names. Then moving on to Rouen for the night, we would spend the next day looking for Marcel Duchamp.
The Braque photographs did not turn out and I would have to return, which I did on Saturday, May 05, the beginning of a holiday weekend. In Dieppe it was impossible to rent a car or find a vacant room, so I backtracked to Rouen where I became a tourist for the weekend. Early Monday morning I picked up a rental car in Dieppe and by noon had taken my photographs in an ideal light and was back in Dieppe waiting for a Ferry to England to attend Terry Frost’s exhibition at the Tate and where we would spend several days visiting London art galleries.
“Now back to Paris and on with the adventure”
CIMETIÈRE DU PÈRE LACHAISE
CIMETIÈRE MONTMARTRE
MÈRE ET FILS
I had been searching for Utrillo’s tomb since beginning this project as he seemed to epitomize all the romantic ideas we have of a “bohemian Montmartre artist.” I had hoped the cemetery tour guide, Vincent de Langlade would be able to help me but he could not. He did, however, tell me that Suzanne Valadon, Utrillo’s mother had been interred in the St.Oen Cemetary just north of the Clignancourt Flee Market.
It was an uncomfortable, claustrophobic metro ride deep into an unfriendly immigrant area of Paris. Very unnerving, so I would walk back into a more friendly neighborhood before catching a metro home.
Suzanne’s tomb was easy to find. I placed my bouquet, took my pictures and facetiously asked her to direct me to her son’s tomb.
Walking a circuitous route back toward Butte Montmartre and the metro station Lamarck–Caullaincourt, where I intended to catch my train, a serendipitous glimpse of a small cemetery changed my focus— Cimetière St.Vincente, one I had completely missed in all my walks around Paris– I had to visit!
Approaching the entrance, at first glance I saw a nicely dressed woman standing as if to greet me. Which she did, asking if she could be of help. When enquiring about Utrillo she simply said, “he’s there below the steps” pointing to some stairs at the rear of the cemetery. I followed her gaze then turned to thank her but she was gone, and just as she had said, the tomb was there.
Thanks Suzanne!
Suzanne Valadon 1865–1938 Paris– Cimetiére de St.Oen
Maurice Utrillo, 1883–1955 Paris– Cimetiére St.Vincente
CIMETIÈRE DE MONTPARNASSE
CIMETIÈRE DU PASSY
GEORGES ROUAULT
Versailles
Georges Rouault, 1871–1958 Cimetière St.Louis, Versailles
April 26, 1990, 11:30am: I arrived at the Gare Rive Gauche in Versailles and my mind wandered back two centuries to the turmoil surrounding the Great Chateau and its last regal occupant, Louis XVI, whose feeble efforts to reform a long entrenched bureaucracy met such resistance from all levels of society.
In retrospect, there was a certain inevitability in my encounter at Cimetière St. Louis. Instead of asking permission, I bypassed the gatehouse. I had been told Rouault’s tomb was close to the main entrance, raised above those surrounding it and easy to find. I walked directly to it–a simple tomb of granite slabs set on a concrete base.
While I was adjusting my tripod the gardener informed me that photography in the cemetery was not allowed. I explained my project showing support documents from the Ministry of Culture. After some words he took me to a bench away from the tomb and told me to wait there quietly while he consulted with the Guardian, who might have time to see me. I plotted ways of sneaking a photograph but could never escape that gardener’s protective gaze.
When Monsieur Le Guardian finally allowed me an audience, he examined my documents and informed me that “papers from Paris carry no weight in Versailles. “Before anyone can photograph one of my tombs it is necessary to go to City Hall and get a signed letter of permission from the Head of Cemeteries.” And why should I have been surprised? I was in a movie and having déjà vu to the hall of mirrors where I got a brief reflection of minor bureaucrats staunchly insisting on a protocol for every simple act, and resisting any slight encroachment on a long tradition of vested authority.
I was determined to follow through so asked if I could use his phone to call a taxi as there were no stands nearby. “NO!” I retraced my steps, past the station, toward the Hall of Minor Pleasures. Limping on a sore foot and cursing petty bureaucrats, I thought kindly of Dr. Guillotine and momentarily reflected on Antoinette’s small farm Le Hameau in the Trianon Garden where she had once naïvely envisioned a more enlightened world uncomplicated by petty egos.
It was a long walk and a long climb up to the fourth floor of the City Hall where, to my amazement, there truly was such a person as Head of Cemeteries. He saw me almost immediately and when I explained the situation his first question to me was, “Why won’t he let you take photographs?” Which of course I couldn’t answer. When I asked him for a letter he simply phoned the guardian at St. Louis and ordered him to allow me to take photographs. I heard him say on the phone “You’ll know who he is, he speaks with an English accent,” as if the encounter which had occupied so much of my day had never occurred. When I passed the gatehouse on my return, the guardian came out shaking his finger and said several times “One only!
3:20pm and in the fading light I took many photographs from different angles hoping to get my revenge and at least one good shot. I didn’t want to have to relive this adventure.
5:00pm — return to Paris.
FERNAND LÉGER
Gif–sur–Yvette
Fernand Léger, 1881–1955 La Nouveau Cimetiér a Jif–sur–¥vette
I learned the location of Léger’s tomb from Vincent de Langlade who accosted me rather rudely in Cimetière Monparnasse while I was re–photographing the tomb of Soutine from a stepladder I had carried through the streets of Paris from my studio in the Marais. I was a bit nervous, as my actions had also attracted the attention of numerous patrolling gendarmes this morning after the vandalizing of some Jewish tombs. It was difficult to explain to them why I needed a ladder in a cemetery. De Langlade said he had previously followed me in Père Lachaise and Cimetière Montmarte. He thought I was trying to cut in on his lucrative occupation of guiding tourists on specialized tours of the Paris cemeteries. After convincing him I was no threat to his business, he gave me a lot of very helpful information.
Paris, Les Halles, April 25, 1990, RER (B4) direction St. Remy Les Chevreus: Arriving at Gif–sur–Yvette at 12 noon I had to wait for an hour while the taxi driver had lunch. Then I was his fare for the afternoon. I explained what I was doing and whose tomb I was looking for, so he took me first to the old cemetery where he left me with a promise to return in a hour or so to see how I was doing. As soon as I passed through the doorway of that old walled burial ground I knew that Léger’s tomb would not there if he’d had his choice. I walked the rows and scanned the names for over an hour then returned to the gate to wait for my taxi, which finally arrived. By 3pm I was at Le Nouveau Cimetière à Gif–sur–Yvette.
There was a lot of casual activity around the entrance which seemed like a local gathering place for the taxi drivers. I don’t recall seeing a gate house, only a flash of red on a distant hill like a startled scarlet tanager. I walked toward it knowing almost for certain it would be Fernand Léger’s tomb–and it was. Against the back wall of the cemetery facing south, overlooking the beautiful village of Gif–sur–Yvette was a black marble tomb reflecting in its highly polished surface the colourful mosaic sculpture that had first attracted my eye. I had recently seen many similar works at the Musée National Fernand Léger in Biot. The afternoon light was perfect.
5pm—return to Paris.
BARBIZON
Jean-François Millet and Théodore Rousseau monument, Barbizon
SOUTHERN FRANCE
PIERRE BONNARD
Le Cannet
Pierre Bonnard, 1867–1947 Cimetière du Cannet
In the spring of 1990, I spent several weeks in the south of France working on this project. I made my base in Nice where many of the artists who influenced my early years as an artist had lived and worked, and spent their final years. Sadly, although I tried many times I was not able to get to the tomb of Matisse, who was buried outside the churchyard of the Franciscan Monastery in Cimiez, enclosed by a huge fence too difficult to scale. It was a similar situation with Picasso who was buried in a tomb jack-hammered from the stone at a corner of his chateau in Varvanargue, near Aix. They would not let me through the gate.
April 30, 1990: Driving to Nice from Grasse where I had been photographing a Fragonard Monument, I got a momentary glimpse of a small cemetery just before the exit to Le Cannet and thought immediately of Pierre Bonnard, who had died there. I had to stop. It took some maneuvering to find my way back to the old cemetery where I hoped I might find Bonnard’s tomb.
Although it is not in my nature to be superstitious, I occasionally try to attach some meaning to my intuitions and coincidental encounters as I wander through these strange spaces—spaces that often seem to occupy more than a physical dimension. Today when I entered the cemetery at Le Cannet it seemed deserted. Then I saw a man lying prostrate on a tomb sobbing and muttering words I could not understand. Was there some omen here or was it simply a personal expression of grief? Or was it just one of those peripatetic mourners who would follow me around the cemeteries in Paris and mourn over the tomb I was trying to photograph? I moved quietly on and went about my business.
There was no gatehouse to get information from so I searched the rows tomb by tomb. After several hours I was hot, thirsty and tired, and ready to give up. Then recalling having seen a tombstone with name “Marthe” in large letters–the name of Pierre Bonnard’s wife. I searched again and soon found the tomb on which were carefully placed (obscuring most of the headstone) a freshly watered pot of flowers, a crockery vase of fresh cut flowers, a glass jar of beach pebbles and a potted aloe plant sitting on a decorated plate—significant signs my initial gaze had overlooked. I spread apart the flowers and below the name Marthe was “Bonnard” in large letters and below that in small letters, Pierre Bonnard. I was elated! Then, as I moved the vase to more clearly expose the names for my photographs, a scream ordering me to leave the tomb alone startled me and I accidentally spilled water from the vase. I turned and a man screaming “Grave-robber,” and shaking his fist at me said he would get the gendarme to deal with me. And off he ran.
I sometimes feel a strange frisson when photographing these tombs and at times it seems like committing an act of violence as I move things to suit my purpose. Ideally, I would like the only trace of my intrusion to exist on the film in my camera where it can later be dealt with objectively. The spilled water would soon disappear in the heat of the Midi sun leaving no trace. But what of the angst of the man who ran off for the gendarme?
Re–living my experience with the guardian at St Louis in Versailles, I calmly placed my brushes on the tomb, took several photographs, very carefully replaced the flowers as they had been before my intrusion, then casually left before any “officials” arrived to stop me.
On the way out of the cemetery I puzzled momentarily over the tomb where the man had been so distraught. Everyone in that area of the cemetery had been in the ground for well over a century. One more mystery!
JAMES WILSON MORRICE
Tunis
Morris, James Wilson 1865–1924 Cimetière du Borgel, Tunis
JAMES WILSON MORRICE
March 24, 1990: Joe Plaskett, Tak Tanabe and I arrived in Tunis, each with a special interest to explore—mine being to find and photograph the tomb of James Wilson Morrice, the Canadian artist who died and was buried there in 1924. At a dinner in Paris a Canadian diplomat told me that he and his wife, when they were posted in Tunis, had visited his tomb and cleared it of weeds. I neglected to note the name of the cemetery.
We settled into three adjoining cavernous rooms In the old Hotel Majestic all with a long history to tell. The antique plumbing required an act of faith before using but the great daily rate had probably changed little, like the linen and décor, since Morrice’s days in Tunis.
I had no idea where to start but simple logic suggested I call the Canadian Embassy for information. However, no one there had heard of the famous Canadian painter J.W. Morrice, let alone where he was buried. They gave me directions to the cemeteries in Tunis and we were on our own. Some sense led us to Cimetière du Borgel where searching the gatehouse records produced no results. As one of my artist friends had his own pressing concerns, and we had only one car, I felt pressured to move on.
I have found on this project that I work best alone, at my own pace, meandering down the many paths my inclinations take me before finally deciding I have reached an impasse. This way I encounter untold surprises and often find that gatehouse records are not always clear and accurate indicators of “who” is planted where. I wanted to stay and do another search, row by row if necessary, but agreed to leave, thinking if we had no luck at the other cemeteries I would return here on my own.
Then, as we were preparing to leave a man waved at us from the gate and came over asking if it was a Canadian we were looking for; he remembered one being moved there from another cemetery many years ago. What a break! Another fortuitous encounter led directly to the tomb of James Wilson Morrice, covered in weeds and wild flowers; an exciting vision that I had come so far to find. They cleared the weeds but we asked them to leave the flowers. We thought that Morrice would have liked it looking a little wild. I took my photographs facing into the sun with Tak and Joe shading the camera lens with their hats. Upon leaving the cemetery I offered the man at the gate a reward for leading us to the tomb, but unlike the hordes of hustlers we were to encounter during the following days of our trip through Tunisia, he would not accept.
As we were leaving a smiling guardian came out of the gate house and gave me a piece of paper on which was written: Cimetière du Borgel a Tunis, Concession 2— Morrice James Wilson, Section C, Carré 4, no. 234.
“And so it Goes”
Mclaren Cemetery, Wakefield Quebec